Theories
are like windows in a house, where you can look through multiple windows into
the same room and get a different view point from each window taken from
this YouTube video
I agree with Bill
Kerr's (2007) observation, "these _isms do not stand still." In other
words, they cannot be used solely. I personally cannot agree solely with Behaviorism,
Cognitivism, or Constructivism, because there are some parts of each with which
I do not agree. This reminds me of Rick Lavoie, who holds
three degrees in special education. I believe his teachings of behavior
management for the classroom are brilliant and most of my classroom structure
is based on his philosophies. I state most, because the more I learned from him,
the more I realized all of his techniques would not work in my classroom. That
does not mean his ideas, techniques, and teachings are any less valuable.
Perhaps in a different setting all of his philosophies would apply. There are
too many factors that influence the classroom to determine why not all are
possible: the students, their background, their disabilities, their behavior
problems, the teacher, the support staff, the administration, the physical structure
of the classroom, and so forth.
Karl Kapp (2007)
agreed with Bill Kerr's ideas when he wrote, "Cognitivism doesn’t explain
100% how humans process information and neither does Constructivism or
Behaviorism. What we need to is take the best from each philosophy and use it
wisely to create solid educational experiences for our learners." This is
what I have been doing thus far, taking what works for me the most and using
that. However, in order to determine what that is, it is critical to learn all
of the aspects of the _isms.
Karl Kapp (2007)
summarized that lower level learning could be related to the Behaviorist
approach, rule-based learning related to Cognitivism, and problem-solving
related to Constructivism. This gave me a greater insight as to why all of Rick
Lavoie's behavior techniques do not work in my classroom. I have an ungraded
classroom of varying developmental levels and learning needs. Rick Lavoie’s techniques
help the behavior management of those who are on the rule-based learning and
problem-solving learning levels. Those on the lower level learning would
require more of a behaviorist approach, which is not fully appropriate for Rick
Lavoie's philosophies.
Here are some video clips of Rick
Lavoie:
Motivational Breakthrough: http://youtu.be/ByjSIcIyDN4
Social Skills and Learning
Disabilities: http://youtu.be/ODxwotH5IEo
Resources
Kapp, K. (2007,
January 2). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought [Web
log
post]. Retrieved from
http://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/
Kerr, B. (2007, January 1). _isms
as filter, not blinker [Web log post]. Retrieved from
http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html