After giving this considerable
thought, I do believe humans have a basic instinct to "interact and work
as a group," but humans are sometimes persuaded to act differently due to environmental
factors (Rheingold, 2008).
For example, two adults may seek each
other to spend a lifetime together, working as a team, and collaborating on all
decisions. However, cultural values from the environment they grew up in may
influence these individual into fulfilling roles that take them away from
collaboration. For example, a woman being set in the role of a housewife and
making all of the decisions that relate to cooking and cleaning.
Technology can facilitate
collaboration among learners based on the constructivist principles through the
use of the Internet. Chat rooms can be used to exchange ideas quickly with
people who are separated through time and space (California Adult Literacy
Professional Development Project, n.d., p. 43). Concept maps provide a visual
representation of what someone is trying to explain. They allow people to add
their opinions and validate or invalidate what someone else shared (California
Adult Literacy Professional Development Project, n.d., p. 44). Technology can
also facilitate collaboration by using social media sites, such as Facebook or
Twitter. Both would allow for ideas to be collected and commented on. Because of
features like “undo,” people can work on the computer on a project together and
easily make changes.
Rozenszayn and Ben-Zvi (2009)
conducted a study to determine if collaborative learning was a meaningful learning
tool in a science classroom. Their research found that students were able to
learn from one another and teach each other, which proved to be beneficial for
learning (p. 124). However, all partners were paired up by their teacher in
developmentally appropriate groups. It is hypothesized that if the students
were paired with other students who were not around the same intellectual
level, not as much progress would be made. Additionally, the students identified
five criteria that needed to be present in order for collaborative learning to
be successful. The criteria were "interdependence between group members
for reaching a mutual goal," "collective responsibility of group
members concerning difficulties," "reciprocity between group members
in the form of oral explanations... geared to solve problems,"
"social cooperation skills," and "social processes need to be
defined in advance" (p. 125). If these factors could be fulfilled,
learning with other students is possible and productive.
This YouTube video,
created by the Science Education Initiative at the University of Colorado at
Boulder, shows how group work can enhance a lesson. One student explained,
"when I am not learning something or I am not getting something, by
working in the groups I am able to experience it through a different way. [I do
this] by seeing how other people are thinking about it so that I can better
understand the concept rather than the single way [the professor] explained
it."
Resources
California Adult Literacy Professional Development Project.
(n.d.). How does technology facilitate constructivist learing? Retrieved from:
http://www.calpro-online.org/eric/docs/brown/brown01_05.pdf
Rheingold, H. (2008, February). Howard Rheingold on collaboration
[Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/howard_rheingold_on_collaboration.html
Rozenszayn, R. & Ben-Zvi, O. (2009, December). When collaborative
learning meets nature: Collaborative learning as a meaningful learning tool in
the ecology inquiry based project. Res Sci Edu, 41, 123-146. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Reggie,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed viewing your video referencing collaborative learning. I think collaborative learning is good in all educational settings. I just don't agree with the words that humans have a "basic instinct". Socially, we are drawn to people who have similar ideas and naturally we can interact and work together. However, in a classroom or work environment, we sometimes have to interact and work with people we might not interact with normally. When that happens, we "learn" how to interact and work in groups. Does this make sense?
Hi Charee,
DeleteI think you are right, maybe "basic instinct" is too strong of a term to describe collaborative learning.
Reggie....
ReplyDeleteHumans also collaborate for selfish reasons...they believe that they will benefit or profit from the experience. Those reasons may affect the collaborative exercise positively or negatively.
....Clarice
You are right!
DeleteHi Regina,
ReplyDeleteI believe that group work and collaboration provides students with
experience and knowledge. It is also, an effective strategy!
Thanks for responding!
Delete